“Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has.”
Cureus is on a mission to change the long-standing paradigm of medical publishing, where submitting research can be costly, complex and time-consuming.
The SIQ for this article will be revealed
once 2 ratings are submitted.
hypertension, prevalence, ischemic heart disease, antihypertensives, type-2 diabetes mellitus, resistant hypertension
Aqeel S. Binaqeel, Hossein A. Filimban , Abdullah A. Fallatah, Salman W. Bafageeh, Sara H. Al Khansa, Bader K. Al Aslab, Rayan S. Alzahrani, Leyan R. Bakedo, Ahmed Abuosa, Ibrahim Jelaidan
Published: October 12, 2022 (see history)
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.30228
Cite this article as: Binaqeel A S, Filimban H A, Fallatah A A, et al. (October 12, 2022) Resistant Hypertension in Patients With Type-2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Single-Center, Cross-Sectional Study. Cureus 14(10): e30228. doi:10.7759/cureus.30228
The prevalence of resistant hypertension in Saudi patients with type-2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) has not been previously estimated. Therefore, our objective was to assess the prevalence and characteristics of resistant hypertensive patients with T2DM at King Abdulaziz Medical City, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
This cross-sectional study included patients with hypertension and T2DM who presented to our center in 2018. We examined 1960 patients with T2DM during the study period; 809 were hypertensives. We compared T2DM patients with controlled hypertension versus resistant hypertension.
The prevalence of resistant hypertension in patients with T2DM was 137/809 (16.93%). The mean age was 66.38±10.80 years, and females presented 56% of the study population (n= 451). Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA; OR: 2.60 [1.15- 5.87]; P=0.02) and ischemic heart disease (IHD; OR: 3.01 [2.04- 4.45]; P˂0.001) were significantly associated with resistant hypertension. The most common medications used with resistant hypertension were calcium channel blockers (CCBs; 89.05%), β-blockers (76.64%), and angiotensin-2 receptor blockers (ARBs; 62.77%).
Resistant hypertension in patients with T2DM is common in Saudi Arabia. Resistant hypertension could be associated with OSA and IHD. Further studies are required to evaluate the temporal relationship between resistant hypertension and risk factors.
Hypertension is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality globally, impacting an estimated 1.4 billion people [1,2]. Chronic hypertension increases the risk of heart attack, stroke, heart failure, renal disease, and mortality if left untreated, presenting major health concerns to patients and healthcare providers [2]. The European Society of Cardiology defines resistant hypertension as the failure of three or more antihypertensive medications to lower systolic and diastolic blood pressure values to <140 mmHg and/or <90 mmHg, respectively [3]. The inadequate control of blood pressure is confirmed by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring or home blood pressure monitoring in patients adherent to therapy [3]. Furthermore, the American College of Cardiology stated that controlled hypertension using at least four medications is also considered resistant hypertension [4]. The recommended treatment strategy for patients with resistant hypertension includes appropriate lifestyle measures and treatment with optimal or best-tolerated doses of three or more drugs. These medications should consist of diuretics, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi), angiotensin-2 receptor blockers (ARBs), and calcium channel blockers (CCBs) [3].
The prevalence of resistant hypertension with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) varies in different countries. A study published in 2015 estimated that the prevalence of resistant hypertension was 10% in Romania [5]. Moreover, according to the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), the prevalence of resistant hypertension was 8.9% in the United States between 2003 and 2008, and has increased to 13% in 2017 [6,7]. The estimated prevalence of T2DM in Saudi Arabia is 23.7% [8], and hypertension is 33% [9]. However, there is no data on resistant hypertension prevalence in patients with type 2 diabetes and their characteristics in Saudi Arabia. Thus, we aimed to assess the prevalence and characteristics of resistant hypertensive patients with T2DM at King Abdulaziz Medical City (KAMC), Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
This cross-sectional study included patients with hypertension and T2DM attending King Faisal Cardiac Center in King Abdulaziz Medical City, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, in 2018. We included patients 18 years old and older who visited the outpatient clinics of the internal medicine and cardiology departments in 2018. Patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (<40%) were excluded as they would be on three types of antihypertensive medications. We examined 1960 patients with T2DM during the study period; 809 were hypertensives.
The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of King Abdullah International Medical Center with the number (NRJ22J/127/05), and the need for the patient’s consent was waived.
Resistant hypertension was diagnosed according to the European guidelines if three or more medications failed to control the blood pressure and the patients adhered to their antihypertensive medications [3]. We reviewed electronic charts to collect patients’ data. Baseline data included age, gender, body mass index (BMI), and systolic and diastolic blood pressure. Additionally, we collected data related to the concomitant comorbidities based on the history provided in the patient’s electronic medical records, including ischemic heart disease (IHD) defined by patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass graft, OSA, chronic kidney disease (CKD), pheochromocytoma, Cushing syndrome, hypothyroidism, and hyperthyroidism. The number of antihypertensive medications and their categories was reported.
We compared patients’ related data between those with controlled versus resistant hypertension with T2DM. Continuous variables were assessed for normality using the Shapiro-Wilk test and histograms. In addition, the student t-test was used to compare normally distributed data, and the Mann-Whitney test for non-normally distributed continuous data. Numerical data were presented as mean and SD if normally distributed and median (25th-75th percentiles) if not normally distributed. Categorical data were presented as absolute numbers and percentages and compared with the Chi-square or Fisher’s exact test when appropriate.
Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with resistant hypertension. Univariable regression was performed, and variables with a P-value of 0.15 or less were introduced into a stepwise multivariable regression analysis with backward elimination. Factors associated with resistant hypertension were divided into two models: model 1 included patients’ demographics and comorbidities, and model 2 had antihypertensive medications. Model calibration was tested using the Hosmer-Lemeshow test and model discrimination with the C-statistics and area under the curve. Multicollinearity was tested using variance inflation factor (VIF), and all factors included in the final multivariable regression model had a VIF of 1.5 or less.
All analyses were performed using Stata 16.1 (StataCorp, TX, USA), and a p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Among patients with T2DM and concomitant hypertension, the prevalence of resistant hypertension was estimated to be 137/809 (16.93%).
The mean age was 66.38±10.80 years, with no difference between patients with resistant and controlled hypertension. Females presented 56% of the study population (n= 451). There were no differences in gender, BMI, and HbA1c between groups. Patients with T2DM and resistant hypertension had a higher prevalence of OSA, CKD, and IHD than those with T2DM and non-resistant hypertension. Neither group had significant differences in smoking, HbA1c, and endocrine disease. In both groups, no patient was affected with pheochromocytoma, Cushing syndrome, or renal artery stenosis (Table 1).
CKD: Chronic kidney disease; IHD: Ischemic heart disease; OSA: Obstructive sleep apnea.
The most common medications used were ARBs (47.71%), CCBs (46.97%), and β-blockers (36.96%). In patients with resistant hypertension, the most common medications were CCBs (89.05%), β-blockers (76.64%), and ARBs (62.77%). Diuretics (P˂0,001), mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA) (P= 0.01), CCBs (P˂0.001), ARBs (P ˂0.001), β-blockers (P˂0.001), and vasodilators (P˂0.001) were used more frequently in patients with resistant hypertension compared to controlled hypertension. However, there were no differences in ACEi, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and steroids use between groups (Table 2).
ACEi: Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors; ARBs: Angiotensin receptor blocker; CCBs: Calcium channel blockers; MRA: Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist; NSAIDs: Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.
Among the comorbidities associated with T2DM and resistant hypertension, OSA (OR: 2.60 [1.15- 5.87]; P= 0.02) and IHD (OR: 3.01 [2.04- 4.45]; P˂0.001) were significantly associated with resistant hypertension (Table 3).
*Model 1: Hosmer-Lemeshow, P=0.07, AUC=0.63.
**Model 2: Hosmer-Lemeshow, P=0.07, AUC=0.95.
¥ Number of medications excluded for collinearity
CKD: Chronic kidney disease; IHD: Ischemic heart disease; OSA: Obstructive sleep apnea; ACEi: Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors; ARB: Angiotensin receptor blocker; CCBs: Calcium channel blockers; MRA: Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist; NSAIDs: Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.
Hypertension is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide [1]. However, the prevalence of resistant hypertension in patients with T2DM in Saudi Arabia was not estimated before, despite the high prevalence of diabetes and hypertension [8,9]. This retrospective cross-sectional study estimated the prevalence of resistant hypertension in T2DM patients presenting to a single center in 2018. The prevalence was 16.93% (137/809), and most patients were females. ARBs, CCBs, and β- blockers were the most common medications used in all patients, while CCBs, β-blockers, and ARBs were the most common medications in patients with resistant hypertension. In addition, IHD, CKD, and OSA were significantly higher in patients with resistant hypertension.
Our study’s prevalence of resistant hypertension in patients with T2DM was consistent with other studies. Solini A et al. reported a prevalence of 17% in Italy [10], and Mohammad A et al. reported a prevalence of 16% in Jordan [11]. These articles reported a significant association between resistant hypertension and T2DM. In a meta-analysis by Achelrod D et al., the prevalence of resistant hypertension ranged from 13% to 16% [12]. Noubiap JJ et al. estimated the prevalence of true resistant hypertension in a meta-analysis of 3.2 million patients to be 10%, and the prevalence differed significantly according to the associated disease [13]. The variability of the prevalence of resistant hypertension in different studies could be attributed to several factors, including the study design, definitions used, the settings used to measure blood pressure, and the associated comorbidities.
Our study evaluated factors associated with resistant hypertension in patients with T2DM. IHD and OSA were significantly associated with resistant hypertension in our cohort. A study reported that 14.1% of resistant hypertensive patients had associated IHD [14]. This percentage is remarkably less than our population, in which 43.07% of resistant hypertension patients had IHD. On the other hand, Mohammad A et al. reported that 54.6% (77/141) of resistant hypertension patients had IHD [11]. Our data resource could explain our results since most data were from a cardiac center. In regards to OSA, a multi-center study on OSA patients with resistant hypertension by Sapiña-Beltrán E et al. estimated that 237/284 (83.6%) had resistant hypertension and OSA [15]. In addition, approximately 47.2% (112/237) of those patients had concomitant T2DM [15]. In our data, only 7.30% (10/137) of patients had OSA with resistant hypertension and T2DM. The inconsistency of our data to the Sapiña-Beltrán E et al. study could be due to the limited availability of sleep study centers to diagnose OSA within our population. Furthermore, in contrast to the literature, CKD was not associated with resistant hypertension in our series by the multivariable regression analysis [10,13,14]. In our study, the CKD diagnosis was not based on estimated glomerular filtration rate measurement but the history available in the patient’s electronic medical files, making our data susceptible to recall bias.
ACEi, ARBs, and diuretics were the most frequently used medications to manage resistant hypertension, followed by CCBs and β-blocker [16]. Despite not being a first-line antihypertensive drug, β-blockers were our patient’s second most-used drug. Similar results were found in a study by Ciobanu DM et al. [5]. This increased use of β-blockers is most likely linked to our study’s high prevalence of IHD.
Further exploration of the causation and association between resistant hypertension and other risk factors is needed to implement new strategies and plans for intervention. In addition, better diagnostic tools to differentiate between true and pseudo-resistant hypertension should be prioritized to decrease unnecessary intervention and improve the quality of care. Finally, the discrepancy in resistant hypertension prevalence across different regions is small. Thus, creating an intervention that could be implemented in different settings regardless of socioeconomic status is possible [14].
The study has several limitations, including the study design. The retrospective design has its inherent limitations of selection, recall, and reporting biases. Additionally, the study is cross-sectional; therefore, the temporal relationship between risk factors and resistant hypertension could not be established. Moreover, the study is a single-center experience, mainly from a cardiac center. Including other centers and different healthcare settings could significantly change the results. Furthermore, more robust criteria for the comorbidities could yield better insights. Finally, we were not able to stage CKD or OSA due to the recent implementation of the electronic data system in our center, which led to data deficiency as not all data were transferred to the new system.
Resistant hypertension in patients with T2DM is common in Saudi Arabia. Resistant hypertension could be associated with OSA and IHD. Further studies are required to evaluate the temporal relationship between resistant hypertension and risk factors.
College of Medicine, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Jeddah, SAU
College of Medicine, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Jeddah, SAU
College of Medicine, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Jeddah, SAU
College of Medicine, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Jeddah, SAU
Pharmaceutical Care Services, King Abdulaziz Cardiac Center, National Guard Health Affairs, Jeddah, SAU
College of Medicine, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Jeddah, SAU
College of Medicine, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Jeddah, SAU
Medicine and Surgery, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, SAU
Cardiology, National Training Institute, Cairo, EGY
Cardiology, King Abdulaziz Cardiac Center, National Guard Health Affairs, Jeddah, SAU
Human subjects: Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. King Abdullah International Medical Center issued approval NRJ22J/127/05. Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue. Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
10.7759/cureus.30228
Binaqeel A S, Filimban H A, Fallatah A A, et al. (October 12, 2022) Resistant Hypertension in Patients With Type-2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Single-Center, Cross-Sectional Study. Cureus 14(10): e30228. doi:10.7759/cureus.30228
Peer review began: September 12, 2022
Peer review concluded: October 02, 2022
Published: October 12, 2022
© Copyright 2022
Binaqeel et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License CC-BY 4.0., which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
CKD: Chronic kidney disease; IHD: Ischemic heart disease; OSA: Obstructive sleep apnea.
ACEi: Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors; ARBs: Angiotensin receptor blocker; CCBs: Calcium channel blockers; MRA: Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist; NSAIDs: Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.
*Model 1: Hosmer-Lemeshow, P=0.07, AUC=0.63.
**Model 2: Hosmer-Lemeshow, P=0.07, AUC=0.95.
¥ Number of medications excluded for collinearity
CKD: Chronic kidney disease; IHD: Ischemic heart disease; OSA: Obstructive sleep apnea; ACEi: Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors; ARB: Angiotensin receptor blocker; CCBs: Calcium channel blockers; MRA: Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist; NSAIDs: Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.
Scholarly Impact Quotient™ (SIQ™) is our unique post-publication peer review rating process. Learn more here.
This link will take you to a third party website that is not affiliated with Cureus, Inc. Please note that Cureus is not responsible for any content or activities contained within our partner or affiliate websites.
Scholarly Impact Quotient™ (SIQ™) is our unique post-publication peer review rating process. SIQ™ assesses article importance and quality by embracing the collective intelligence of the Cureus community-at-large. All registered users are invited to contribute to the SIQ™ of any published article. (Authors cannot rate their own articles.)
High ratings should be reserved for work that is truly groundbreaking in its respective field. Anything above 5 should be considered above average. While all registered Cureus users can rate any published article, the opinion of domain experts is weighted appreciably more than that of non-specialists. An article’s SIQ™ will appear alongside the article after being rated twice and is recalculated with each additional rating.
Visit our SIQ™ page to find out more.
Scholarly Impact Quotient™ (SIQ™) is our unique post-publication peer review rating process. SIQ™ assesses article importance and quality by embracing the collective intelligence of the Cureus community-at-large. All registered users are invited to contribute to the SIQ™ of any published article. (Authors cannot rate their own articles.)
Already have an account? Sign in.
Please note that by doing so you agree to be added to our monthly email newsletter distribution list.
By joining Cureus, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.