A genome-wide CRISPR screen identifies CALCOCO2 as a … – Nature.com

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.
Advertisement
Carousel with three slides shown at a time. Use the Previous and Next buttons to navigate three slides at a time, or the slide dot buttons at the end to jump three slides at a time.
25 February 2020
Nicole A. J. Krentz & Anna L. Gloyn
19 May 2021
Joshua Chiou, Ryan J. Geusz, … Kyle J. Gaulton
04 February 2019
Ken Suzuki, Masato Akiyama, … Takashi Kadowaki
04 January 2018
Anup K. Nair, Jeff R. Sutherland, … Leslie J. Baier
22 January 2018
Sílvia Bonàs-Guarch, Marta Guindo-Martínez, … David Torrents
21 September 2018
Heshan Peiris, Sangbin Park, … Seung K. Kim
05 November 2020
Suna Onengut-Gumuscu, Umadevi Paila, … Stephen S. Rich
08 October 2018
Anubha Mahajan, Daniel Taliun, … Mark I. McCarthy
28 July 2022
Daniel DiCorpo, Sheila M. Gaynor, … Alisa K. Manning
Nature Genetics (2022)Cite this article
1638 Accesses
42 Altmetric
Metrics details
Identification of the genes and processes mediating genetic association signals for complex diseases represents a major challenge. As many of the genetic signals for type 2 diabetes (T2D) exert their effects through pancreatic islet-cell dysfunction, we performed a genome-wide pooled CRISPR loss-of-function screen in a human pancreatic beta cell line. We assessed the regulation of insulin content as a disease-relevant readout of beta cell function and identified 580 genes influencing this phenotype. Integration with genetic and genomic data provided experimental support for 20 candidate T2D effector transcripts including the autophagy receptor CALCOCO2. Loss of CALCOCO2 was associated with distorted mitochondria, less proinsulin-containing immature granules and accumulation of autophagosomes upon inhibition of late-stage autophagy. Carriers of T2D-associated variants at the CALCOCO2 locus further displayed altered insulin secretion. Our study highlights how cellular screens can augment existing multi-omic efforts to support mechanistic understanding and provide evidence for causal effects at genome-wide association studies loci.
Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have delivered thousands of robust associations for type 2 diabetes (T2D) and related traits but most map to noncoding regions with a likely regulatory function¹. Incomplete fine mapping means most GWAS loci are not mapped to a single causal variant but rather multiple variants in a credible set, each of which could potentially influence gene expression in a different cellular context. The typical step after fine mapping involves connecting the putatively causal variants and the regulatory elements to the genes they regulate, using methods such as cis-expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) colocalization, single-cell chromatin co-accessibility and DNA proximity assays^2,3,4,5. The limitations of these approaches are their cell type- and context dependency (assays conducted in inappropriate cell types or states may reveal variant-to-gene connections not related to disease pathogenesis) and molecular pleiotropy (variants of interest may regulate transcription of several genes in cis, obscuring the identity of the causal transcript). These approaches can generate hypotheses about candidate effectors but typically fall short of providing definitive evidence.
Perturbation studies can provide more compelling evidence of causation, but only if using authentic models and disease-relevant phenotypes⁶. The strongest evidence arises from disease-associated coding variants that provide a readout of the consequences of perturbations of gene and protein function in humans, but the low frequency of most such variants limits this approach². Human cellular models and CRISPR-based technologies provide an attractive alternative for generating genome-wide profiles of the phenotypic consequences of gene perturbation and understanding disease biology⁶. Central to this aspiration is confidence in the disease relevance of a cell type. For T2D, both physiological and epigenomic evidence highlight the central role of pancreatic islets, and consequently the insulin-producing beta cells, in mediating disease risk^3,4,5,6,7. Substantial differences between rodent and human islets or beta cells argue for the use of human tissue and cell lines^{8,9,10,11,12,13}. We and others have generated large transcriptomic and epigenomic resources in this key human tissue enabling genome-wide integration of genetic and genomic data to identify candidate effector transcripts at T2D GWAS loci^4,7,14,15. We now complement these resources with a genome-wide CRISPR loss-of-function (LoF) screen in the well-characterized human pancreatic beta cell line EndoC-βH1 to identify genes that regulate insulin content^16,17,18. The immortalized EndoC-βH1 cell line displays a multi-omic signature similar to primary human beta cells albeit with distinct characteristics highlighting the fetal and transformed origin of the cell line^18,19. While insulin content is lower compared to primary islets, EndoC-βH1 cells demonstrate similar electrophysiological and secretory properties, making it a physiologically relevant model to study beta cell function in vitro^17,20,21,22.
This genome-wide CRISPR screen in a human beta cell line provides cellular evidence for 580 genes as regulators of beta cell function, supports a disease-relevant and likely causal role of 20 genes at T2D loci and identifies the autophagy receptor CALCOCO2 as a regulator of human beta cell function. We demonstrate that carriers of diabetes risk alleles in CALCOCO2 have altered insulin secretion and that loss of CALCOCO2 in human beta cells leads to autophagy-mediated altered insulin granule homeostasis.
Glucose-stimulated insulin secretion is the primary measure of beta cell function but an unsuitable phenotypic readout for pooled high-throughput screening as secreted insulin cannot be linked to its cellular source. Unlike insulin secretion, intracellular insulin content, however, can be quantified using fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS). Changes in insulin content have also been associated with T2D-associated risk genes, such as at the peptidylglycine α-amidating monooxygenase (PAM) locus where T2D risk alleles cause reduced expression and/or function and reduced PAM expression is associated with reduced insulin content or for TCF7L2, the locus mediating the strongest risk for T2D and a master regulator of insulin production with decreased insulin content in carriers of the risk allele^23,24,25.
Using a FACS readout, we designed a pooled CRISPR LoF screening pipeline in the human pancreatic beta cell line EndoC-βH1 based on introducing single-gene knockouts (KOs) through a lentiviral genome-wide CRISPR library (Fig. 1a). Cells were sorted into populations containing either low or high levels of intracellular insulin, and stably integrated sgRNAs were identified through next-generation sequencing.
a, Pipeline for a genome-wide CRISPR LoF screen in EndoC-βH1 from viral transduction (left) to antibiotic selection (middle) and a final FACS selection followed by sequencing and enrichment analysis of integrated sgRNAs (right). b,c, FACS staining for intracellular insulin in INS-silenced EndoC-βH1 (siINS, blue) or their respective non-targeting controls (siNT, pink) as individual plots (b) or histogram overlay (c). d,e, The associated mRNA expression of INS (d) and corresponding levels of intracellular insulin as measured by alphaLISA (e). f,g, FACS staining using the insulin antibody (blue) or isotype control (pink) in the human embryonic kidney cell line HEK293T as individual plots (f) or histogram overlay (g). h, Pipeline for a small-scale CRISPR screen in EndoC-βH1 targeting only three genes (NMS, INS and PAM) alongside EV control cells. FACS sorting gates for low insulin (dashed line) were determined based on control cells transduced in parallel. sgRNA enrichment was assessed in INS^low compared to INS^high. i,j, FACS staining in EndoC-βH1 comparing insulin staining of EV control cells (pink) and cells from the small-scale CRISPR screen (blue) as individual plots (i) or overlay (j). Respective boxes indicate sorting gates INS^low and INS^high. k, sgRNA enrichment for all individual sgRNAs in INS^low compared to INS^high from control (gray) samples and positive controls (INS and PAM, purple and pink). The boxplot spans the minimal to maximal values, while the center line depicts the median. All data are mean ± s.e.m. from two (i–k) or three independent experiments and representative FACS plots are shown with their respective silencing efficiency. Data were analyzed by two-sample t test (e). No graphical depiction of significance indicates nonsignificant results. NT, non-targeting. log₂(FC), log₂(fold change); EV, empty vector; SSC-A, side scatter area.
To ensure that the FACS-based insulin content readout in EndoC-βH1 was highly specific and sensitive, we chose an antibody and protocol based on comparing several complementary strategies (Extended Data Fig. 1). Near complete siRNA-based knockdown of INS in EndoC-βH1 resulted in two populations with distinct average fluorescence intensities, validating the sensitivity (Fig. 1b–d). The level of separation was in concordance with an independent alphaLISA quantification of insulin content demonstrating around 46% of residual protein (Fig. 1e). The specificity of the antibody was confirmed in the non-INS expressing human cell line HEK293T (Fig. 1f,g). Finally, the screening protocol was validated by targeting three genes in a small-scale screen including the positive control genes INS and PAM, known to induce a reduction in insulin content upon deletion, and NMS, a negative control not expressed in EndoC-βH1 (ref. 23) (Fig. 1h). Compared to an empty vector (EV) control coding for Cas9 only, the cells demonstrated a reduced INS FACS signal and enrichment of INS and PAM sgRNA within the INS^low population, whereas sgRNAs targeting NMS showed no difference (Fig. 1i–k). Consistent with its previously shown weaker effect on insulin content, sgRNAs targeting PAM demonstrated a highly replicable but lower enrichment compared to sgRNAs targeting INS, confirming the suitability of the pipeline for genome-wide screening²³.
We performed two independent genome-wide screen replicates in the human beta cell line EndoC-βH1, using the Toronto KnockOut version 3.0 (TKOv3) CRISPR library targeting 18053 protein-coding human genes with four sgRNAs per gene²⁶. Per replicate, a minimum of 670 million cells were lentivirally transduced at a low multiplicity of infection (MOI) with a coverage of around 500 cells per sgRNA (Fig. 1a). Compared to controls, the screening cells demonstrated a wider insulin signal distribution in the FACS, particularly toward lower insulin, indicative of altered insulin content due to CRISPR KO-mediated effects (Fig. 2a,b and Extended Data Fig. 2). Two cell populations were collected, those with low (INS^low) and those with high insulin content (INS^high), followed by sgRNA amplification and sequencing (Extended Data Fig. 3). We used the MAGeCK algorithm to compare sgRNA abundance and identify sgRNAs enriched or depleted in INS^low cells relative to INS^high cells²⁷. Enriched sgRNAs identify positive regulator genes leading to a reduction in insulin content upon gene KO, and depleted sgRNAs identify negative regulators associated with an increase in insulin content upon gene KO. To reduce the number of false-positive hits, genes were only classified as screening hits if sgRNAs demonstrated consistent effects across replicates and met the threshold (FDR < 0.1) for at least two of the four sgRNAs in both independent screening replicates. In total, 580 genes fulfilled these stringent criteria, we considered these as robust, reproducible screening hits and took them forward for further evaluation (Supplementary Table 1).
a,b, FACS staining for intracellular insulin in EndoC-βH1 transduced with the CRISPR screening library compared to cells transduced with EV virus or cells stained with isotype matching antibodies shown as individual plots (a) and histogram overlay (b). c, Changes in sgRNA count from low to high insulin content screening sample with each color representing the same sgRNA across the two screen replicates for INS and NKX2-2 (log₂(FC) 1.06 and 1.21, respectively). The black dashed line represents the median sgRNA count for this gene. d, sgRNA distribution of log₂(FC) for all sgRNAs (blue) compared to control sgRNAs targeting LacZ, EGFP and luciferase (gray). The black line indicates the median values for each group. e, sgRNA distribution of log₂(FC) within each screening replicate with specific sgRNAs of interest (four per gene) highlighted in individual colors per gene, while overall sgRNA distribution is depicted in light gray. f, Individual genes of interest with their respective sgRNAs per replicate, the color ranges from not significant (white) to highly significant (dark blue) based on the FDR thus representing a significant sgRNA enrichment or depletion between INS^low and INS^high. INS (+) and NMS (−) on the top panel represent positive and negative control genes, respectively. Data are from two independent genome-wide CRISPR screen replicates, and screen FDR values were determined using MAGeCK (e, f) or through a two-sample t test (d). log₂(FC), log₂(fold change); EV, empty vector.
To evaluate the biological relevance of these hits, we asked if our screen was able to identify genes known to be involved in insulin regulation and beta cell function. sgRNAs targeting INS were enriched in the INS^low population, confirming the sensitivity of the screen (Fig. 2c,e,f). The overall enrichment of INS was lower than that of other known regulators of insulin secretion as only three of four sgRNAs induced an effect (Fig. 2c,f). Other established regulators of beta cell function and genes involved in monogenic diabetes or T2D risk were identified among the screening hits, such as NKX2.2, SLC2A2, PPP1R15B and IGF2 (Fig. 2c,e,f)^{28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35}. Non-targeting control sgRNAs showed no effect on insulin content (Fig. 2d). In addition to direct regulators of insulin content, the screen also identified multiple general regulators of transcription and translation with indirect effects on the phenotype (Fig. 2f), all of them classified as common essential genes in CRISPR screens with longer culturing durations^36,37,38.
We next considered whether the screening hits were enriched for functional classifications involved in the regulation of insulin content. Gene Ontology (GO) term and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analysis highlighted insulin and beta cell function-associated categories and transcription- and translation-related categories consistent with modifying total intracellular protein levels (Fig. 3a)^39,40. STRING protein network analysis further emphasized the fundamental role of INS within the screen as a central node with several independent connections (Fig. 3b)⁴¹. The screening hits were significantly enriched for shared protein networks, providing additional confidence in the sensitivity to identify interrelated complexes (Fig. 3c and Extended Data Fig. 4). Many hits mapped to the functional categories of ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis and autophagy, mitochondrial ATP synthesis, vesicle trafficking and exocytosis, GPCR signaling, lipid metabolism and the MAPK signaling pathway, all of them containing both previously unknown regulators of insulin content and those with known roles in insulin secretion or beta cell function.
a, Pathway enrichment analysis assessing KEGG pathways or GO terms for biological processes. Selected pathways are shown, ranked by P value. b,c, STRING pathway analysis showing protein–protein associations including physical and functional interactions between INS and other screening hits (b) and for screening hits clustered into functionally associated groups (c).
Next, we sought to use our cellular screen as complementary perturbation evidence to support the assignment of effector genes at T2D loci. We applied three complementary approaches (https://t2d.hugeamp.org) that have been developed to combine genetic association results for T2D with diverse sources of genetic and genomic data to generate lists of the ‘effector’ gene(s) most likely to mediate the genetic associations^42,43,44,45. The merged effector gene assignments from the three methods generated a list of 336 candidate effector transcripts at T2D loci, with no candidates identified by all three methods. The intersection of this list with the set of screen hits yielded 20 genes (Supplementary Table 2) for which our screen provided biological evidence for a role in a disease-relevant phenotype. Of these 20 genes, 5 (25%) genes are assigned as ‘causal’ by the curated heuristic effector gene prediction method with a further 4 (20%) genes assigned between strong, moderate and possible.
To compare how our perturbation screen performed against other commonly applied approaches for effector transcript prioritization, we explored a relatively modest albeit the largest to date, eQTL study of 420 human islet donors¹⁵. In this study, colocalization between T2D GWAS and islet cis-eQTL signals was supported by two methods at 20 loci, rising to 39 when statistical support for colocalization was required from only one of the approaches. While both approaches (CRISPR screen and eQTL) identified similar numbers of genes, no gene was common among them, suggesting that islet eQTLs are unlikely to cause reduced insulin content and additional cellular phenotypes (for example insulin secretion) may underly their effect. These observations support the inclusion of multiple approaches for optimal effector gene prioritization and encourage both larger eQTL studies to detect further signals and an expansion of targeted and/or genome-wide screens for additional cellular phenotypes across relevant cell types.
We focused our follow-up studies on one of the 20 predicted effector genes and the screening hit CALCOCO2 as its role in human beta cells has not been explored (Fig. 4a)^{14,46,47,48,49}. CALCOCO2 has a crucial role in selective autophagy by linking the degradation target to the autophagic machinery^50,51. So far, it has been shown to initiate autophagy for invading pathogens (xenophagy) and damaged mitochondria (mitophagy)^50,51,52. CALCOCO2 maps to a T2D GWAS locus usually named for the gene TTLL6, where fine mapping has resolved the signal to an ~177-kb region containing multiple genes and 118 variants in the credible set⁵. An independent coding variant signal within CALCOCO2 (rs10278, p.Pro347Ala) suggests that CALCOCO2 merits close attention as the effector transcript⁵. Physiological clustering has revealed that this locus is likely to exert its primary effect on disease risk through the modulation of beta cell function⁵. In this CRISPR screen, KO of CALCOCO2 resulted in a decrease in insulin content (Fig. 4b). None of the other genes at this locus showed an effect on insulin content in the screen, further supporting CALCOCO2 as the likely effector transcript (Extended Data Fig. 5).
a, Gene prioritization approach assessing genes with low evidence as T2D effector transcripts (as outlined in the integration approach) that have also been identified as a screening hit, highlighted CALCOCO2. b, Changes in sgRNA count from low to high insulin content sample with each color representing the same sgRNA across the two screen replicate. The black dashed line represents the median sgRNA count for this gene (log₂(FC): 1.08). c–n, All data are from siCALCOCO2-treated EndoC-βH1 compared to non-targeting control cells. c, mRNA expression of CALCOCO2 (P = 0.0002). d, Protein level of CALCOCO2 and its loading control GAPDH. e, Quantification of CALCOCO2 western blot data, normalized to GAPDH and siNT control cells (P = 0.0008). f, Cell count measurements. g, Insulin content in pg per 20,000 cells, measured by alphaLISA (P = 0.0166). h, Protein level of insulin and its loading control GAPDH. The antibody also detects insulin precursors but only gives a weak signal compared to mature insulin. i, Quantification of insulin and western blot data normalized to GAPDH and siNT control cells (P = 0.0015). j, mRNA expression of INS. k,m, Insulin secretion normalized to siNT (k; P = 0.0051, 0.0336, 0.0282 and 0.0152) or to insulin content and siNT (m) in 1 mM, 20 mM, 1 mM + 100 μM tolbutamide or 20 mM glucose + 100 μM diazoxide. l,n, Insulin secretion fold change from 1 to 20 mM glucose normalized to siNT (l) or to insulin content and siNT (n). The protein level is displayed as a percentage of siNT, which is highlighted as a dotted line at 100%. All data are mean ± s.e.m. from three (c,e,i,j,m,n), four (f), six (k,l) or 12 (g) independent experiments. Data were analyzed using two-sample t test (c), one-sample t test (e,i,), one-way (f,g,j,l,n) or two-way (k,m) ANOVA with Sidak’s multiple comparison test. No graphical depiction of significance indicates nonsignificant results. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001. FC, fold change; NT, non-targeting.
Source data
We obtained independent confirmation of the effect of CALCOCO2 loss through siRNA-based knockdown in EndoC-βH1. Silencing of CALCOCO2 was highly efficient and induced a mean mRNA and protein reduction of 78.1% and 80.0% (Fig. 4c–e and Extended Data Fig. 7). Cell viability was not affected (Fig. 4f). Intracellular insulin content was assessed using two independent antibody-based detection methods. Highlighting the sensitivity of the CRISPR screen, insulin content was significantly reduced in CALCOCO2-silenced cells by 24.0% and 38.0%, measured by alphaLISA and western blot, respectively (Fig. 4g–i). This effect could be rescued upon overexpression of CALCOCO2 harboring silent mutations to prevent siRNA silencing (Extended Data Fig. 5). The reduction in insulin content was not due to decreased insulin gene expression (Fig. 4j).
To confirm that this screen correctly identified T2D-associated genes modulating beta cell function, we examined additional genes predicted to be causal for T2D which were not identified as screening hits (Extended Data Fig. 6)⁴³. QSER1 and PLCB3 contain coding variants consistent with a causal role in T2D but with unresolved mechanism of effect or tissue of action^5,53. Consistent with our negative screening results, siRNA knockdown of either gene did not affect intracellular insulin content or insulin secretion. Together, this genome-wide CRISPR screen was able to identify an insulin regulatory function of CALCOCO2 while distinguishing other phenotypes likely related to islet-cell development (QSER1) or insulin action (PLCB3).
While we have shown that insulin content is reduced upon loss of CALCOCO2, altered glucose-stimulated insulin secretion cannot be concluded based on changes in insulin content. We therefore independently assessed the effects of CALCOCO2 knockdown on insulin secretion. On average, insulin secretion was significantly reduced by 39.3% upon silencing of CALCOCO2 (Fig. 4k). The glucose stimulation index from low to high glucose was, however, unchanged, indicating an appropriate response to changes in glucose concentrations (Fig. 4l). Normalization to insulin content reduced the difference between CALCOCO2-silenced cells and controls to 30.2%. Even though the level of insulin secretion did not reach baseline upon normalization, the effect was not statistically significant and highlighted reduced insulin content as the underlying cause of the reduction in total insulin secretion (Fig. 4m, n).
We extended our studies to assess CALCOCO2 function in primary human pancreatic islets. Immunofluorescence studies in human pancreas sections confirmed protein expression and localization to the cytoplasm of beta cells (Fig. 5a and Extended Data Fig. 7). To determine whether the effects of CALCOCO2 loss can be replicated beyond in vitro models and beta cells, we performed shRNA knockdown in primary human islets. Islets were dispersed, transduced with shRNA targeting CALCOCO2 (shCALCOCO2) and reaggregated to pseudoislets (Fig. 5b). Successful transduction of pseudoislets was confirmed by assessing green fluorescent protein (GFP) coexpression (Fig. 5c). CALCOCO2 expression was on average reduced by 54.0% compared to non-targeted control shRNA (shNT; Fig. 5d). In line with the results in EndoC-βH1, intracellular insulin demonstrated a modest but consistent reduction of 15.7% (Fig. 5e). Although the decrease in intracellular insulin in pseudoislets was lower than in EndoC-βH1, it was reduced to the same extent in both the cell line and primary human tissue if normalized to the achieved silencing efficiency, supporting a relationship between CALCOCO2 levels and function. Pseudoislets, however, did not demonstrate significantly affected insulin secretion (Fig. 5f,g). Stimulation with high glucose and the secretion potentiator IBMX increased secretion of insulin upon normalization to content in shCALCOCO2. This effect was lost upon normalization to genomic DNA and therefore reflects the impact of changes in insulin content on secretion. We similarly assessed glucagon content and secretion to identify potential effects of CALCOCO2 in alpha cells (Fig. 5h–j). While shCALCOCO2 showed some trend toward blunted glucagon secretion, none of the secretory conditions or glucagon content was significantly changed. Together, our findings show that CALCOCO2 has an important role in regulating insulin content in human beta cells.
a, Immunofluorescence staining of primary human islets in pancreas sections. Sections were double stained for INS (green) and CALCOCO2 (red). Cell nuclei were counterstained with DAPI (blue). Scale bar is 10 μm. b–j, All data are from shCALCOCO2 pseudoislets compared to non-targeting control pseudoislets (shNT). b, Pseudoislet transduction and formation from primary human islets. c, shCALCOCO2 pseudoislets under bright field (top) and GFP positive pseudoislets (bottom). Scale bar is 100 μm. d, mRNA expression of CALCOCO2. e,h, Intracellular insulin (e) and glucagon (h) content. f,g,i,j, Insulin (f,g) or glucagon (i,j) secretion normalized to content (f,i) or to genomic DNA (gDNA) (g,j) in 2.8, 5.6, 16.7 or 16.7 mM glucose + IBMX for insulin secretion and 7, 1, 1 mM glucose + ʟ-arginine or KCl for glucagon secretion. All data are mean ± s.e.m. from two independent donor and three independent immunofluorescence staining. ʟ-Arg, ʟ-arginine; FC, fold change; NT, non-targeting.
The mechanism underlying CALCOCO2’s regulation of insulin content in human beta cells, however, remained to be explored. To perform an unbiased assessment of mRNA expression changes in siCALCOCO2-treated EndoC-βH1, we performed RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) (Supplementary Table 5). Only CALCOCO2 was identified as being significantly differentially expressed, suggesting a primarily posttranscriptional mechanism on insulin content. Albeit below the significance threshold, the next two genes (B4GALT5 and GCNT1) in the list of those differentially expressed are involved in glycosylation/O-glycan processing (Extended Data Fig. 8). Glycosylation is involved in regulating autophagy and together with CALCOCO2s established role as an autophagy receptor, we hypothesized that CALCOCO2’s effect on insulin content was autophagy mediated^{50,51,54,55,56,57}.
Immunofluorescence was used to establish the cellular localization of CALCOCO2 in EndoC-βH1 and showed no colocalization with insulin vesicles (Extended Data Fig. 7). We next performed electron microscopy (EM) to evaluate potential cellular ultrastructural changes upon CALCOCO2 silencing. In line with the reduced total insulin content in pooled measurements, insulin vesicle density was significantly reduced upon CALCOCO2 silencing (Fig. 6a,b). The proportion of mature insulin granules was increased compared to control cells, indicating a reduction in immature and transitioning granules was driving the effect on total insulin content (Fig. 6a,c). This was further confirmed as mature granule density was unaltered (Fig. 6d). Pooled measurements independently corroborated the structural EM data as intracellular pre/proinsulin (referred to as proinsulin) was significantly reduced upon silencing, an effect that was not lost upon normalization to total insulin content (Fig. 6e,f). This reduction in proinsulin was likely not mediated by altered insulin maturation as expression of genes involved in insulin processing (PCSK1, CPE and PCSK2) was unchanged although enzyme activity was not assessed (Extended Data Fig. 8).
a–l, siCALCOCO2-treated EndoC-βH1 compared to siNT. a, Representative images with immature insulin granules (short white arrowheads), mature granules (long white arrowheads) and vacuolic structures (black/white arrowheads). b, Quantification of insulin granules per square micrometer (P = 0.0137). c, Quantification of mature insulin granules normalized to total number of granules per cell (P < 0.0001). d, Quantification of mature insulin granules normalized to square micrometer. e, Proinsulin (ELISA), normalized to siNT (P = 0.0033). f, Proinsulin normalized to total insulin (ELISA) and siNT (P = 0.0081). g, Representative EM images with enlargements (top right), mitochondria (white arrowheads) and vacuolic structures (black/white arrowheads). h, Quantification of altered mitochondria, normalized to total number of mitochondria (P = <0.0001). i, ATP measurements after incubation with low/high glucose, with/without the mitophagy inducer FCCP. j, Representative images of enlarged vacuolated structures in siCALCOCO2, highlighted in a and g with black/white arrowheads. k, Representative staining for LC3 (left) and INS (middle) treated with Bafilomycin A1 (BafA1) or DMSO. l, Higher magnification of the indicated LC3 regions (white box). m–p, Intact nondiabetic primary human islets. m,n, Carrier (GC) and control (CC) islets for the coding variant rs10278 (protective allele G) in insulin content (m) and insulin secretion (n). P = 0.0029. o,p, Islets with indicated genotype at the GWAS lead variant rs35895680 (protective allele C) in insulin content (o) and insulin secretion (p). P = 0.0004. Boxes show the interquartile range between first and third quartiles, the median (horizontal line) and whiskers from the 10th to the 90th percentile (m–p). All data are mean ± s.e.m. from three (a,g,i–l) or four (e,f) independent experiments; 16 (b,d), 13 (c) and 14 (h) siNT cells and 27 (c), 40 (b,d,h) siCALCOCO2 cells over three independent experiments and at least 21 donors (Supplementary Table 6; m–p). Homozygous individuals for rs10278 (GG) were not analyzed due to low sample size (m,n). Scale bar is 1 μm (a,g), 0.25 μm (j), 20 μm (k) and 10 μm (l). Data were analyzed using two-sample t test (b–d,h), two-way ANOVA Sidak’s multiple comparison test (i,m–p) or one-sample t test (e,f). No graphical depiction of significance indicates nonsignificant results. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001. NT, non-targeting.
EM analysis revealed that the mitochondrial structure was dramatically altered in siCALCOCO2 cells with distorted cristae and shape, consistent with increased mitochondrial separation or fission before targeting by autophagy (Fig. 6g,h)⁵⁸. Unexpectedly, mitochondrial ATP production, however, was unaffected upon stimulation with glucose (Fig. 6i). Induction of FCCP-mediated mitochondrial depolarization to induce mitophagy reduced ATP production equally in siCALCOCO2 and control cells, indicating functional mitophagy (Fig. 6i). The expression levels of the mitophagy mediators PINK1 and PARKIN (PARK2) were not affected (Extended Data Fig. 8). Taken together, there was no indication that mitochondrial function or externally induced mitophagy was affected upon CALCOCO2 silencing. Additionally, siCALCOCO2-silenced EndoC-βH1 demonstrated an accumulation of vacuolated structures with many containing remnants of cellular components, highlighting alterations in degradation-based mechanisms (Fig. 6j).
We next assessed if this reduction in immature granules and proinsulin was mediated through an effect of CALCOCO2 on autophagy. Autophagy is highly dynamic and needs to be artificially blocked to accurately measure the amplitude of autophagic flux⁵⁹. We incubated EndoC-βH1 with the lysosomal inhibitor Bafilomycin A1 (BafA1), which prevents autophagosome-lysosome fusion and lysosomal degradation, and assessed LC3-positive puncta which are representative of autophagosomes. While the formation of LC3-positive structures markedly increased in both conditions, the accumulation was more prominent in CALCOCO2-silenced cells (Fig. 6k, l). Colocalization of LC3-positive autophagosomes with insulin containing granules further supported an autophagy-mediated reduction of insulin granules upon loss of CALCOCO2 (Fig. 6k). We further confirmed that the reduction in insulin granules and proinsulin was not mediated by the ubiquitin-proteasome system as the proteasome inhibitor MG132 did not restore proinsulin content (Extended Data Fig. 8).
Our results indicate that CALCOCO2 is a regulator of insulin granule homeostasis and mediates its observed effect on total insulin content through autophagy-based reduction in proinsulin and immature granules.
Having identified CALCOCO2 as a regulator of insulin content, we next investigated whether carriers of T2D risk alleles at the CALCOCO2 locus exhibited similar secretory phenotypes to support CALCOCO2 as the effector transcript at this locus. We assessed insulin content and secretion in intact primary islets from nondiabetic organ donors stratified for their genotypes at two independent T2D-association signals at the CALCOCO2 locus (Supplementary Table 6). We selected a likely causal coding variant (rs10278) identified in an exome-array study and the lead GWAS variant from the large 99% credible set (118 variants) at the T2D-associated locus (rs35895680)⁵. The rs10278 variant is predicted to result in a substitution of proline with alanine at codon 347 in most isoforms, including the major isoform in human islets (NM_005831)⁵. Its effect allele G, which is associated with reduced risk of T2D, demonstrated altered glucose-stimulated insulin secretion but not altered insulin content in primary islets (Fig. 6m,n). The GWAS lead variant rs35895680 (allele C reduces risk) which is in strong linkage disequilibrium with a variant in the credible set located in the 3′-UTR of CALCOCO2 did not affect insulin content. Islets from individuals homozygous for the T2D-protective allele, however, demonstrated increased insulin secretion under high-glucose conditions compared to those with one copy (Fig. 6o,p). Collectively, we demonstrate that T2D-associated risk variants associated with CALCOCO2 affect insulin secretion in primary human islets although the relationships of the variant with insulin content and CALCOCO2 function remain to be explored.
Recent efforts to identify effector transcripts at GWAS association signals have concentrated on integrating disease-relevant transcriptomic and epigenomic datasets or on detailed mechanistic studies at a single locus^{4,7,14,15,23,47,60,61,62,63,64}. Genome-wide perturbation datasets in disease-relevant cell types could close the gap between effector transcript and disease biology and enable focused translational efforts. Here, we present a genome-wide pooled CRISPR LoF screen to perform a comprehensive characterization of regulators of insulin content in the human beta cell line EndoC-βH1.
Our CRISPR screening approach was successful in identifying robust modulators of insulin content, as shown through the detection of not only the insulin gene itself but also genes involved in monogenic types of diabetes or known regulators of insulin transcription and secretion. Through the integration of our screening hits with prioritization tools, 20 genes were identified as effector transcripts working through beta cell dysfunction. Our data add to a growing number of genome-wide multi-omic datasets which can be harnessed to connect genetic discovery and biological mechanisms and serve as a model for future cellular studies not only in human beta cells. Furthermore, our unbiased genome-wide data will be relevant for other traits/diseases where the pancreatic beta cell has a role, including type 1 diabetes.
We initially identified the T2D risk-associated gene CALCOCO2 as a CRISPR screening hit and a positive regulator of insulin content. We selected this gene for further study due to its potential to underlie a T2D GWAS signal and a lack of knowledge on its role in beta cell biology. Our focused functional studies confirmed its effect on insulin content and showed an indirect, insulin-content-mediated reduction in insulin secretion. We therefore provide functional data connecting CALCOCO2 to beta cell function, a likely effect on disease pathogenesis and tissue of action, expanding the evidence for a potential causal role in T2D risk (Supplementary Discussion)^5,53,65.
While CALCOCO2 has been reported as an essential receptor in Parkin-mediated mitophagy and even though we observed altered mitochondrial ultrastructure, its loss did not result in impaired mitochondrial function in EndoC-βH1 or reduced clearance of mitochondria upon artificial induction of mitophagy, pointing toward a mitochondria-independent mechanism in CALCOCO2’s regulation of insulin content^52,66,67,68. Instead, our results support an effect on insulin content through degradation of proinsulin-containing immature insulin granules. While the effects of the coding T2D risk variant in CALCOCO2 on expression and function remain to be established, the observed reduced insulin secretion might represent the long-term effects of altered insulin granule homeostasis through adapted insulin expression and granule biogenesis to compensate for changes in granule degradation, resulting in an affected pool of mature and secretion-ready granules.
While this genome-wide CRISPR screen has identified genes involved in beta cell function and provides a resource for future integration and in-depth studies, it only captures one disease-relevant cellular phenotype in one condition. The screen assessed changes in insulin content under basal glucose conditions, and consequently, genes affecting insulin secretion without modulating insulin content or changes in intracellular content that only occur upon glucose starvation or stimulation were not captured.
This is an important step to accelerate efforts on genome-wide screens, both loss and gain of function in disease-relevant human cell lines for T2D and represents a proof of concept that cellular screens can augment genomic efforts linking variants to regulatory elements and transcripts to bridge the gap between gene expression and disease-relevant cellular biology. In summary, we have developed and performed a genome-wide pooled CRISPR screen in a model of human beta cells, providing a comprehensive perturbation dataset to associate genes of interest with a direction of effect, tissue of action and functional mechanism. We have successfully demonstrated how a genome-wide perturbation set can be used as a prioritization tool for causal genes at T2D GWAS loci and highlight CALCOCO2 as a modulator of insulin granule homeostasis and beta cell function with a likely causal role in T2D.
Human pancreatic islets and pancreas tissue were isolated from deceased donors under ethical approval from the Human Research Ethics Board of the University of Alberta (Pro00013094, Pro00001754) and obtained from the NIDDK-funded Integrated Islet Distribution Program (IIDP) (RRID:SCR _014387) and the National Diabetes Research Institute (NDRI; https://ndriresource.org/). All donors’ families gave informed consent for the use of pancreatic tissue in research and were not financially compensated. HEK293T and EndoC-βH1 were obtained from Sigma (12022001) and EndoCells, now known as https://www.humancelldesign.com, respectively¹⁹.
HEK293T cells were routinely passaged in DMEM 6429 (Sigma-Aldrich) containing 10% fetal calf serum (FCS), 100 U ml⁻¹ penicillin and 100 µg ml⁻¹ streptomycin. EndoC-βH1 were routinely passaged as described in Supplementary Methods. All cells were mycoplasma-free (Lonza) and grown at 37 °C and 5% CO₂. If indicated, EndoC-βH1 cells were treated with 10 nM BafA1, 1 μM MG132 or DMSO for 7 h (all Sigma-Aldrich).
Deidentified human islets and pancreas samples for immunostaining and functional shRNA experiments were obtained from four nondiabetic organ donors procured through the IIDP and the Alberta Diabetes Institute Islet Core⁶⁹. Human islets for T2D risk allele studies were obtained from 194 nondiabetic organ donors (hemoglobin A1C (HbA1C) < 6) isolated and assessed at the Alberta Diabetes Institute IsletCore as previously described and cultured in DMEM with 10% FCS and 100 U ml⁻¹ penicillin/streptomycin (all Thermo Fisher Scientific) at 37 °C and 5% CO₂ (refs. 69,70). Human pancreatic tissue was procured through the NDRI. Details of donors used in the study are shown in Supplementary Tables 3 and 6. There was no significant difference in age, sex, BMI or HbA1c between groups. DNA was extracted from digested pancreatic exocrine tissue using the DNeasy Blood & Tissue kit (Qiagen), and genotyping was performed on an Infinium Omni2.5Exome-8 BeadChip array (Illumina).
Single CRISPR sgRNAs were cloned into plentiCRISPRv2 (Addgene, 52961) as described in Supplementary Methods. Briefly, BsmBI compatible tails were added to complementary sgRNA oligonucleotides and annealed (Supplementary Table 4). PlentiCRISPRv2 was digested and ligated with annealed sgRNA oligonucleotides followed by transformation and amplification in competent cells. Correct sgRNA integration was validated through Sanger Sequencing, and plasmids were further used to produce lentivirus.
Toronto human knockout pooled library (TKOv3) containing 71,090 sgRNAs based on a lentiCRISPRv2 backbone was a gift from Jason Moffat, University of Toronto (Addgene, 90294)²⁶. The library was transformed and amplified in Endura Competent Cells (Lucigen) as described in Supplementary Methods²⁶. Transformation efficiency was determined through serial dilution to ensure sgRNA representation, and plasmids were subsequently extracted using Plasmid Mega kits (Qiagen). A sequencing library was prepared as described below, and library representation was confirmed through sequencing on a NextSeq500 (Illumina) using 75 bp single end reads.
Lentivirus for individually cloned sgRNAs and pooled libraries was produced and titered as described in Supplementary Methods. Briefly, CRISPR plasmids were cotransfected in 60% confluent HEK293T with packaging vectors pMD2.G (Addgene, 12259) and psPAX2 (Addgene, 12260) using jetPRIME transfection reagents (Polyplus transfection). Viral supernatant was collected at 48 h and 72 h post-transfection and concentrated using ultracentrifugation. The functional viral titer was determined in EndoC-βH1 by measuring the percentage of survival after transduction with different viral dilutions and antibiotic selection. Cell viability was assessed using the CyQUANT Direct Cell Proliferation assay (Invitrogen). The required amount of lentivirus to achieve 26% survival which is representative of an MOI of 0.3 was calculated and used in subsequent small-scale or genome-wide screen transductions. EndoC-βH1 cells were transduced 48 h after seeding for 6 h and selected for 7 d in 4 μg ml⁻¹ puromycin with media changes as required.
Two independent genome-wide CRISPR screens were performed consecutively in EndoC-βH1 with independent lentiviral CRISPR library transductions, FACS and sgRNA-seq. Each screen was performed at a coverage of 500 cells per sgRNA and MOI of 0.3. A total of 670 million and 744 million cells were transduced in replicate one and two, respectively. The cells were transduced as described and incubated in 4 μg ml⁻¹ puromycin for 7 d with media changes as required followed by collecting, staining and FACS analysis.
EndoC-βH1 cells were collected and incubated with LIVE/DEAD Fixable Far Red Dead Cell Stain (Thermo Fisher Scientific) for 30 min at room temperature and washed in 1% BSA in PBS. The cells were fixed and permeabilized using the BD Cytofix/Cytoperm kit (BD Biosciences) for 20 min at 4 °C and washed using Perm/Wash Buffer (BD Biosciences). Staining with primary antibodies was performed overnight at 4 °C followed by incubation with suitable secondary antibodies diluted in Perm/Wash Buffer (Supplementary Table 4). Upon testing several INS targeting antibodies, a rabbit monoclonal anti-INS antibody from Cell Signaling (3014) was used in the genome-wide screen. The samples were filtered through a 70-μm cell strainer and sorted on a FACSAria III (BD Biosciences) using a 100-μm nozzle. Isotype and transduction controls stained with each antibody alone were analyzed alongside the samples. Samples were gated based on live and single cells before INS level assessment. Gates for cells with reduced INS level (INS^low) were set based on the isotype control and the highest 10% of INS expressing cells were sorted as INS^high. Sorted cell samples were stored at −80 °C until DNA extraction. Flow cytometry data were analyzed using Flowjo 10.6 (BD Biosciences).
DNA was extracted from frozen FACS-sorted samples using QIAamp Blood Maxi/Mini Kit (Qiagen) and processed for sequencing in a two-step PCR approach. Integrated sgRNAs were amplified using Q5 polymerase (NEB) with 2.5 μg DNA input per reaction and an optimized number of cycles per sample. Specific Illumina TruSeq adapters were attached to each sample using Q5 polymerase (NEB) with an optimized number of cycles (Supplementary Table 4). PCR products were run on a 2% gel and purified using QIAquick Gel extraction kit (Qiagen). Each Illumina library sample was qPCR based quantified using the KAPA Library Quantification Kit (Roche) before pooling, and multiplexed sequencing on a NEXTSeq500 (Illumina) was performed as 75 bp reads with standard Illumina sequencing primer and PhiX to approximately 20% spike-in.
Raw fastq sequencing read files were merged for each sample using the ‘cat’ command. To identify enriched and depleted sgRNAs in this CRISPR screen, we used the MAGeCK (v0.5.9.2) algorithm²⁷. Briefly, the ‘count’ command was used to extract and count sgRNA sequences from the raw fastq files based on the TKOv3 library input yielding a mean read count of 981 aligned reads per sgRNA (Extended Data Fig. 3). sgRNAs with low read counts of less than 10 and sgRNAs mapping to genes that were not expressed in EndoC-βH1 were excluded. The ‘test’ command was used with the paired module to assess and analyze sgRNA enrichment or depletion between INS^low and INS^high populations. The analysis median normalizes read counts across samples to account for varying read count depth and applies a mean-variance model to identify significant sgRNA enrichment or depletion. MAGeCK multiple-testing adjusted sgRNA-level enrichment scores were the basis for gene-level hit selection. We applied additional stringent criteria to only prioritize hits with highly consistent effects across both replicates requiring genes to have an FDR < 0.1 for at least two of four sgRNAs in both independent replicates. CRISPR screen analysis was performed in Python 3.8 and R 3.5.
Enriched GO and KEGG pathways within the screening hits were determined using the Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery 6.8 with homo sapiens as list and background input³⁹. Protein connectivity networks based on physical and functional interactions were identified among screening hits using STRING v11 (ref. 41). Only interactions with a high confidence score of ≥0.9 were selected.
Forward siRNA-based silencing in EndoC-βH1 was performed at 24 h after plating using ON-TARGET plus SMARTpool siRNAs or a non-targeting control (Dharmacon; Supplementary Table 4) at 15-nM final concentration. siRNAs were pre-incubated with 0.4% Lipofectamine RNAiMAX (Invitrogen) in Opti-MEM reduced serum-free medium (Gibco) for 15 min at room temperature before dropwise addition to the culture. Cells were assayed or collected 72 h post-transfection. CALCOCO2 silencing in experiments presented in Fig. 6 was performed at a final concentration of 50 nM siRNA and assessed after 96 h.
Lentiviral constructs coding for shRNAs targeting human CALCOCO2 were obtained from Dharmacon (Supplementary Table 4), and virus was produced as described above. Primary islets were dispersed into single cells by enzymatic digestion (Accumax, Invitrogen), and 1 × 10⁶ cells were transduced with 1 × 10⁹ viral units per 1 mL. Transduced islet cells were cultured in ultralow attachment well plates for 5 d before further analysis.
Silent mutations were introduced into the CDS of human CALCOCO2 at four target sites based on the target regions of the ON-TARGET plus SMARTpool CALCOCO2 siRNA. Restriction sites containing EcoRI and BamHI motives and Kozak sequences were added to the 5′ and 3′ terminus of the CDS. The gene fragment was synthesized (IDT) and cloned into the plasmid pCDH-CMV-MCS-EF1-copGFP. Empty plasmid served as a control in subsequent experiments. Lentivirus was produced as described above, and EndoC-βH1 cells were transduced at an MOI of 0.5.
RNA for gene expression analysis from EndoC-βH1 was extracted using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen) and synthesized into complementary DNA using the GoScript Reverse Transcriptase System (Promega). RNA for gene expression analysis from primary human pseudoislets was extracted using the PicoPure RNA isolation kit (Life Technologies), and cDNA was synthesized using the Maxima first strand cDNA synthesis kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Quantitative qPCR (qPCR) was performed using TaqMan real-time PCR assays on a 7900HT Fast Real-Time PCR System (all Applied Biosystems, Supplementary Table 4). Ct-values were analyzed using the ΔΔCt method, and target genes were normalized to the combined average of the housekeeping PPIA, GAPDH and TBP. CALCOCO2 expression in EndoC-βH1 and primary islets was extracted from previously published and analyzed RNA-seq data^71,72.
RNA-seq was performed using PolyA capture with an average of >20 million paired-end reads on a NEXTSeq500 (Illumina). Fastq files were aligned to human genome reference (GRCh38) using STAR v2.7.9a (Spliced Transcripts Alignment to Reference) with ENSEMBL gene annotations (v101). Gene expression levels were counted using featureCounts (v2.0.1) on exonic reads. Differential expression was compared using the Wald test in DESeq2 (v1.26.0). P values were adjusted using the Benjamini and Hochberg method.
sgRNA integrations in the small-scale screen were quantified using SYBR Green-based quantitative PCR and primer targeting the respective sgRNA sequences (Supplementary Table 4). DNA from FACS-sorted EndoC-βH1 was extracted as described. Each sample was prepared using 20 ng of total DNA and SYBR Green PCR Master mix (Bio-Rad), following the manufacturer’s instructions. The samples were amplified and analyzed as described for gene expression experiments.
Silenced EndoC-βH1 cells were starved overnight at 48 h post-transfection in culture medium containing 2.8 M glucose followed by 30 min incubation in 0 mM glucose. Insulin secretion was initiated through static incubations in the indicated glucose or secretagogues conditions for 1 h. Insulin containing supernatant was collected, and cells were lysed in ice-cold acid ethanol to release intracellular insulin. Insulin was quantified using the Insulin (human) AlphaLISA Detection kit and the EnSpire Alpha Plate Reader (both Perkin Elmer) based on 1:10 and 1:200 dilutions for supernatant and insulin content, respectively. Intracellular proinsulin was quantified using the Proinsulin ELISA kit (Mercodia). Secreted insulin was normalized to the level of intracellular insulin content or cell count, which was measured before cell lysis using the CyQUANT direct cell proliferation assay (Invitrogen).
Groups of 15 islets in triplicate were pre-incubated for 1 h at 37 °C in Krebs Ringer Buffer (KRB) (115 mM NaCl; 5 mM KCl; 24 mM NaHCO₃; 2.5 mM CaCl₂; 1 mM MgCl₂; 10 mM HEPES (pH 7.4); 0.1% BSA) with 1 mM glucose. Islets were subsequently incubated for 1 h in 1 mM glucose KRB followed by a 1 h stimulation in 16.7 mM glucose KRB. Supernatants were removed and total insulin content was extracted from the islet pellet using acid ethanol. Samples were stored at −20 °C and assayed for insulin via chemiluminescence using the STELLUX Chemi Human Insulin ELISA (Alpco).
Batches of 25 pseudoislets were used per donor for in vitro secretion assays in RPMI 1640 (Gibco) supplemented with different levels of glucose. For insulin secretion assays, pseudoislets were pre-incubated for 1 h at 2.8 mM glucose followed by incubation at 2.8, 5.6, 16.7 and 16.7 mM + IBMX glucose concentrations for 60 min each. For glucagon secretion assays, pseudoislets were incubated at 7, 1, 1 mM + 10 mM arginine glucose concentrations for 60 min each. Supernatants were collected, and cells were lysed in acid ethanol to extract insulin and glucagon content. Human insulin in the supernatants and pseudoislet lysates was quantified using a human insulin ELISA kit (Mercodia). Human glucagon in the supernatants and pseudoislet lysates was quantified using a human glucagon ELISA kit (Mercodia). Secreted insulin and glucagon levels are presented as a percentage of gDNA, quantified from the pseudoislet lysates.
EndoC-βH1 were incubated for 1 h at 37 °C in glucose secretion assay buffer (SAB) (114 mM NaCl, 4.7 mM KCl, 1.2 mM KH₂PO₄, 1.16 mM MgSO₄, 25.5 mM NaHCO₃, 2.6 mM CaCl₂, 20 mM HEPES (pH 7.3), 0.2% BSA). Following starvation, the cells were stimulated for 40 min with 0 mM or 20 mM glucose-containing SAB supplemented with either DMSO or 10 μM FCCP and lysed in 100 μl ATP assay buffer (Biovision). ATP content in the lysates was measured using a luminometric assay following the manufacturer’s instructions (Biovision) and normalized to total protein contents as determined by BCA protein assay (Pierce).
Whole-cell protein extracts were obtained from cell pellets through lysis in RIPA buffer (50 mM Tris pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 1% Triton X-100, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS) containing 1X protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche). Protein concentrations were quantified using the DC protein assay (Bio-Rad), 10 μg of total protein were mixed with sample buffer (4× Laemmli Buffer (Bio-Rad), 10% β-mercaptoethanol (Sigma-Aldrich), and boiled for 10 min at 80 °C. Denatured samples were run on a 4–20% Criterion TGX Stain-Free Precast Gel for 15 min at 300 V in Tris-glycine-SDS buffer and transferred to a 0.2 μm polyvinylidene difluoride using the Trans-Blot Turbo Transfer System (all Bio-Rad). Unspecific antibody binding was blocked through incubation with 3% BSA in Tris-buffered saline containing 0.1% Tween-20 (TBST) for 1 h at room temperature. Primary antibody incubations were performed at 4 °C overnight followed by incubation with HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies for 1 h at room temperature (Supplementary Table 4). Blots were imaged using the ChemiDoc MP Imaging System (Bio-Rad) and reprobed as described using loading control antibodies of appropriate size. Image Lab 6.0 software (Bio-Rad) was used to quantify protein bands and proteins of interest were normalized to their respective loading control on the same blot.
Immunofluorescence analysis in human pancreatic tissue. Pancreata were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde overnight, cryoembedded, and sections of 4 μm were prepared. Tissue sections were dipped in distilled water, boiled for 20 min in target retrieval solution (Dako), permeabilized for 10 min at room temperature using 1% PBS-Triton X-100 (Sigma-Aldrich) and unspecific antibody binding was blocked using 1% BSA (Roche), 0.2% nonfat milk, 0.5% Triton X-100, 1% DMSO in PBS (all Sigma-Aldrich). Primary antibody incubations were performed overnight at 4 °C followed by incubation with secondary Alexa Fluor-conjugated antibodies at room temperature for 1 h (Supplementary Table 4). The slides were mounted using VectaShield mounting media containing DAPI (Vector Laboratories) and imaged on a Zeiss AxioM1 (Zeiss) microscope using an ×20 and ×40 objective. ImageJ 1.52b software was used to prepare immunofluorescence images.
EndoC-βH1 cells were plated in Nunc Lab-Tek II Chamber Slides (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and fixed with 3% PFA-K-PIPES and 3% PFA-Na₂BO₄ for 5 and 10 min, respectively, followed by permeabilization with 0.1% Triton X-100 for 30 min at room temperature (all Sigma-Aldrich). The cells were incubated in blocking solution containing 5% donkey serum (Jackson ImmunoResearch) in PBS for 30 min. Primary antibodies were diluted in blocking solution and slides incubated overnight at 4 °C followed by incubation with secondary Alexa Fluor-conjugated antibodies and DAPI (MP Biomedicals) at room temperature for 1 h (Supplementary Table 4). Imaging was performed on a STELLARIS 8 Confocal Microscope (Leica Microsystems).
Control and silenced EndoC-βH1 cells were resuspended in 10% gelatin in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer (pH 7.4) at 37 °C and allowed to equilibrate for 5 min. Cells were pelleted, excess gelatin removed, chilled to 4 °C and incubated with cold 1% osmium tetroxide rotating for 2 h at 4 °C. They were washed three times with cold ultrafiltered water, en-bloc stained overnight in 1% uranyl acetate at 4 °C while rotating. The samples were dehydrated in a series of ethanol washes (30%, 50%, 70% and 95%) for 20 min each at 4 °C, equilibrated to room temperature, washed in 100% ethanol twice and incubated in propylene oxide (PO) for 15 min. The samples were infiltrated with EMbed-812 resin mixed with PO at a 1:2, 1:1 and 2:1 ratio for 2 h each. They were incubated in 2:1 resin to PO overnight rotating at room temperature, placed into EMbed-812 for 4 h and subsequently into molds with fresh resin followed by incubation at 65 °C overnight. Sections of 80 nm were picked up on formvar/carbon-coated 100 mesh Cu grids and stained for 30 s in 3.5% uranyl acetate in 50% acetone followed by 0.2% lead citrate for 3 min. Imaging was performed using JEM-1400 120 kV (JEOL) and images were taken using a Gatan Orius 4k × 4k digital camera. Image quantification was independently performed by three blinded assessors.
Statistical analyses were performed in Prism 8.1 (GraphPad Software). A number of biological independent replicates are shown as individual data points with exact numbers indicated in the respective figure legends. The error bars represent the standard error of the mean. No statistical method was used to predetermine sample size. Significant outlier in primary islet assessments from T2D risk carriers was excluded based on the pre-established ROUT outlier test (Q = 1%). If appropriate, fold changes were plotted but statistical analysis was performed on log-transformed values. If required, such as for imaging analysis, assessors were blinded to sample allocation. Normally distributed variables were compared between two or more groups using two-sample Student’s t test or one-way ANOVA followed by Sidak’s multiple comparison test. Samples that were normalized to their respective control within a single replicate were analyzed using a one-sample Student’s t test.
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Fastq sequencing files from the CRISPR screen have been deposited in the European Nucleotide Archive (ENA) at EMBL-EBI under accession number PRJEB44712. Fastq sequencing files from RNA-Sequencing experiments for siCALCOCO2 samples have been deposited in the European Genome-phenome Archive (EGA) under study number EGAS00001006127 and EndoC-βh1 expression data from a previously published study can be accessed under PRJEB15283 (ENA)⁷¹. The data are freely available to download while the processed counts can be found in Supplementary Dataset 1. RNA-seq data were aligned to the human genome reference GRCh38 (ftp://ftp.ensembl.org/pub/release-101/fasta/homo_sapiens/dna/Homo_sapiens.GRCh38.dna.primary_assembly.fa.gz) and counted with the gene annotation (ftp://ftp.ensembl.org/pub/release-101/gtf/homo_sapiens/Homo_sapiens.GRCh38.101.gtf.gz) downloaded from Ensembl database. Source data of unprocessed blots and Extended Data can be accessed online. Source data are provided with this paper.
The source code of MAGeCK is freely available at http://liulab.dfci.harvard.edu/Mageck and differential gene expression analysis was performed using the DESeq2 R package. Respective code is available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7226348.
Mahajan, A. et al. Multi-ancestry genetic study of type 2 diabetes highlights the power of diverse populations for discovery and translation. Nat. Genet. 54, 560–572 (2022).
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 
Krentz, N. A. J. & Gloyn, A. L. Insights into pancreatic islet cell dysfunction from type 2 diabetes mellitus genetics. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 16, 202–212 (2020).
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 
Dimas, A. S. et al. Impact of type 2 diabetes susceptibility variants on quantitative glycemic traits reveals mechanistic heterogeneity. Diabetes 63, 2158–2171 (2014).
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 
Thurner, M. et al. Integration of human pancreatic islet genomic data refines regulatory mechanisms at type 2 diabetes susceptibility loci. eLife 7, e31977 (2018).
Article  Google Scholar 
Mahajan, A. et al. Refining the accuracy of validated target identification through coding variant fine-mapping in type 2 diabetes. Nat. Genet. 50, 559–571 (2018).
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 
Udler, M. S. et al. Type 2 diabetes genetic loci informed by multi-trait associations point to disease mechanisms and subtypes: a soft clustering analysis. PLoS Med. 15, e1002654 (2018).
Article  Google Scholar 
Pasquali, L. et al. Pancreatic islet enhancer clusters enriched in type 2 diabetes risk-associated variants. Nat. Genet. 46, 136–143 (2014).
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 
Benner, C. et al. The transcriptional landscape of mouse beta cells compared to human beta cells reveals notable species differences in long non-coding RNA and protein-coding gene expression. BMC Genomics 15, 620 (2014).
Article  Google Scholar 
Fiaschi-Taesch, N. M. et al. Human pancreatic β-cell G1/S molecule cell cycle atlas. Diabetes 62, 2450–2459 (2013).
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 
Henquin, J.-C., Dufrane, D., Kerr-Conte, J. & Nenquin, M. Dynamics of glucose-induced insulin secretion in normal human islets. Am. J. Physiol. Metab. 309, E640–E650 (2015).
CAS  Google Scholar 
De Vos, A. et al. Human and rat beta cells differ in glucose transporter but not in glucokinase gene expression. J. Clin. Invest. 96, 2489–2495 (1995).
Article  Google Scholar 
Braun, M. et al. Voltage-gated ion channels in human pancreatic beta-cells: electrophysiological characterization and role in insulin secretion. Diabetes 57, 1618–1628 (2008).
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 
Rorsman, P. & Ashcroft, F. M. Pancreatic β-cell electrical activity and insulin secretion: of mice and men. Physiol. Rev. 98, 117–214 (2018).
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 
Varshney, A. et al. Genetic regulatory signatures underlying islet gene expression and type 2 diabetes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 2301–2306 (2017).
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 
Viñuela, A. et al. Genetic variant effects on gene expression in human pancreatic islets and their implications for T2D. Nat. Commun. 11, 4912 (2020).
Article  Google Scholar 
Grotz, A. K. et al. A CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing pipeline in the EndoC-βH1 cell line to study genes implicated in beta cell function. Wellcome Open Res. 4, 150 (2019).
Article  Google Scholar 
Hastoy, B. et al. Electrophysiological properties of human beta-cell lines EndoC-βH1 and -βH2 conform with human beta-cells. Sci. Rep. 8, 16994 (2018).
Article  Google Scholar 
Lawlor, N. et al. Multiomic profiling identifies cis-regulatory networks underlying human pancreatic β cell identity and function. Cell Rep. 26, 788–801 (2019).
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 
Ravassard, P. et al. A genetically engineered human pancreatic β cell line exhibiting glucose-inducible insulin secretion. J. Clin. Invest. 121, 3589–3597 (2011).
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 
Andersson, L. E. et al. Characterization of stimulus-secretion coupling in the human pancreatic EndoC-βH1 β cell line. PLoS ONE 10, e0120879 (2015).
Article  Google Scholar 
Krishnan, K., Ma, Z., Bjorklund, A. & Islam, M. S. Calcium signaling in a genetically engineered human pancreatic beta-cell line. Pancreas 44, 773–777 (2015).
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 
Teraoku, H. & Lenzen, S. Dynamics of insulin secretion from EndoC-βH1 β-cell pseudoislets in response to glucose and other nutrient and nonnutrient secretagogues. J. Diabetes Res. 2017, 2309630 (2017).
Article  Google Scholar 
Thomsen, S. K. et al. Type 2 diabetes risk alleles in PAM impact insulin release from human pancreatic β-cells. Nat. Genet. 50, 1122–1131 (2018).
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 
Grant, S. F. A. et al. Variant of transcription factor 7-like 2 (TCF7L2) gene confers risk of type 2 diabetes. Nat. Genet. 38, 320–323 (2006).
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 
Zhou, Y. et al. TCF7L2 is a master regulator of insulin production and processing. Hum. Mol. Genet. 23, 6419–6431 (2014).
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 
Hart, T. et al. Evaluation and design of genome-wide CRISPR/SpCas9 knockout screens. Genes Genomes Genet. 7, 2719–2727 (2017).
CAS  Google Scholar 
Li, W. et al. MAGeCK enables robust identification of essential genes from genome-scale CRISPR/Cas9 knockout screens. Genome Biol. 15, 554 (2014).
Article  Google Scholar 
Sussel, L. et al. Mice lacking the homeodomain transcription factor Nkx2.2 have diabetes due to arrested differentiation of pancreatic beta cells. Development 125, 2213–2221 (1998).
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 
Doyle, M. J. & Sussel, L. Nkx2.2 regulates beta-cell function in the mature islet. Diabetes 56, 1999–2007 (2007).
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 
Sansbury, F. H. et al. SLC2A2 mutations can cause neonatal diabetes, suggesting GLUT2 may have a role in human insulin secretion. Diabetologia 55, 2381–2385 (2012).
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 
Abdulkarim, B. et al. A missense mutation in PPP1R15B causes a syndrome including diabetes, short stature, and microcephaly. Diabetes 64, 3951–3962 (2015).
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 
Modi, H. et al. Autocrine action of IGF2 regulates adult β-cell mass and function. Diabetes 64, 4148–4157 (2015).
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 
Casellas, A. et al. Insulin-like growth factor 2 overexpression induces β-cell dysfunction and increases beta-cell susceptibility to damage. J. Biol. Chem. 290, 16772–16785 (2015).
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 
Mercader, J. M. et al. A loss-of-function splice acceptor variant in IGF2 is protective for type 2 diabetes. Diabetes 66, 2903–2914 (2017).
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 
Flannick, J. et al. Exome sequencing of 20,791 cases of type 2 diabetes and 24,440 controls. Nature 570, 71–76 (2019).
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 
Tsherniak, A. et al. Defining a cancer dependency map. Cell 170, 564–576 (2017).
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 
Behan, F. M. et al. Prioritization of cancer therapeutic targets using CRISPR–Cas9 screens. Nature 568, 511–516 (2019).
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 
Dempster, J. M. et al. Agreement between two large pan-cancer CRISPR-Cas9 gene dependency data sets. Nat. Commun. 10, 5817 (2019).
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 
Huang, D. W., Sherman, B. T. & Lempicki, R. A. Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat. Protoc. 4, 44–57 (2009).
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 
Ogata, H. et al. KEGG: kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 27, 29–34 (1999).
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 
Szklarczyk, D. et al. STRING v11: protein–protein association networks with increased coverage, supporting functional discovery in genome-wide experimental datasets. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, D607–D613 (2019).
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 
Forgetta, V. et al. An effector index to predict target genes at GWAS loci. Hum. Genet. 141, 1431–1447 (2022).
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 
Type 2 Diabetes Knowledge Portal. Curated T2D effector gene predictions. https://t2d.hugeamp.org/method.html?trait=t2d&dataset=mccarthy (2019).
Type 2 Diabetes Knowledge Portal. Integrated classifier predictions. https://t2d.hugeamp.org/method.html?trait=t2d&dataset=manningexp (2020).
Type 2 Diabetes Knowledge Portal. Accelerating medicines partnership program—type 2 diabetes. https://t2d.hugeamp.org/news.html (2020).
Greenwald, W. W. et al. Pancreatic islet chromatin accessibility and conformation reveals distal enhancer networks of type 2 diabetes risk. Nat. Commun. 10, 2078 (2019).
Article  Google Scholar 
van de Bunt, M. et al. Transcript expression data from human islets links regulatory signals from genome- wide association studies for type 2 diabetes and glycemic traits to their downstream effectors. PLoS Genet. 11, e1005694 (2015).
Article  Google Scholar 
Dupuis, J., Langenberg, C., Prokopenko, I., Saxena, R. & Soranzo, N. New genetic loci implicated in fasting glucose homeostasis and their impact on type 2 diabetes risk. Nat. Genet. 42, 408 (2010).
Google Scholar 
Ingelsson, E. et al. Detailed physiologic characterization reveals diverse mechanisms for novel genetic loci regulating glucose and insulin metabolism in humans. Diabetes 59, 1266–1275 (2010).
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 
Xie, X. et al. Molecular basis of ubiquitin recognition by the autophagy receptor CALCOCO2. Autophagy 11, 1775–1789 (2015).
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 
Boyle, K. B., Ravenhill, B. J. & Randow, F. CALCOCO2/NDP52 initiates selective autophagy through recruitment of ULK and TBK1 kinase complexes. Autophagy 15, 1655–1656 (2019).
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 
Furuya, N. et al. NDP52 interacts with mitochondrial RNA poly(A) polymerase to promote mitophagy. EMBO Rep. 19, e46363 (2018).
Article  Google Scholar 
Mahajan, A. et al. Fine-mapping of an expanded set of type 2 diabetes loci to single-variant resolution using high-density imputation and islet-specific epigenome maps. Nat. Genet. 50, 1505–1513 (2018).
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 
Fahie, K. & Zachara, N. E. Molecular functions of glycoconjugates in autophagy. J. Mol. Biol. 428, 3305–3324 (2016).
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 
Marsh, S. A., Powell, P. C., Dell’italia, L. J. & Chatham, J. C. Cardiac O-GlcNAcylation blunts autophagic signaling in the diabetic heart. Life Sci. 92, 648–656 (2013).
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 
Park, S. et al. O-GlcNAc modification is essential for the regulation of autophagy in Drosophila melanogaster. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 72, 3173–3183 (2015).
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 
Guo, B. et al. O-GlcNAc-modification of SNAP-29 regulates autophagosome maturation. Nat. Cell Biol. 16, 1215–1226 (2014).
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 
Twig, G. et al. Fission and selective fusion govern mitochondrial segregation and elimination by autophagy. EMBO J. 27, 433–446 (2008).
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 
Klionsky, D. J. Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition). 12, 1–222 (2016).
Gaulton, K. J. et al. A map of open chromatin in human pancreatic islets. Nat. Genet. 42, 255–259 (2010).
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 
Dwivedi, O. P. et al. Loss of ZnT8 function protects against diabetes by enhanced insulin secretion. Nat. Genet. 51, 1596–1606 (2019).
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 
Fadista, J. et al. Global genomic and transcriptomic analysis of human pancreatic islets reveals novel genes influencing glucose metabolism. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 13924–13929 (2014).
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 
Miguel-Escalada, I. et al. Human pancreatic islet three-dimensional chromatin architecture provides insights into the genetics of type 2 diabetes. Nat. Genet. 51, 1137–1148 (2019).
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 
Rai, V. et al. Single-cell ATAC-Seq in human pancreatic islets and deep learning upscaling of rare cells reveals cell-specific type 2 diabetes regulatory signatures. Mol. Metab. 32, 109–121 (2020).
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 
Bonàs-Guarch, S. et al. Re-analysis of public genetic data reveals a rare X-chromosomal variant associated with type 2 diabetes. Nat. Commun. 9, 321 (2018).
Article  Google Scholar 
Lazarou, M. et al. The ubiquitin kinase PINK1 recruits autophagy receptors to induce mitophagy. Nature 524, 309–314 (2015).
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 
Fex, M. et al. The pathogenetic role of β-cell mitochondria in type 2 diabetes. J. Endocrinol. 236, R145–R159 (2018).
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 
Heo, J.-M., Ordureau, A., Paulo, J. A., Rinehart, J. & Harper, J. W. The PINK1-PARKIN mitochondrial ubiquitylation pathway drives a program of OPTN/NDP52 recruitment and TBK1 activation to promote mitophagy. Mol. Cell 60, 7–20 (2015).
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 
Lyon, J. et al. Research-focused isolation of human islets from donors with and without diabetes at the Alberta Diabetes Institute IsletCore. Endocrinology 157, 560–569 (2016).
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 
Lyon, J., Spigelman, A. F., Fox, J. E. M. & Macdonald, P. E. ADI IsletCore protocols for the isolation, assessment and cryopreservation of human pancreatic islets of langerhans for research purposes V.2. https://www.protocols.io/view/adi-isletcore-protocols-for-the-isolation-assessme-x3mfqk6.html (2021).
Thomsen, S. K. et al. Systematic functional characterization of candidate causal genes for type 2 diabetes risk variants. Diabetes 65, 3805–3811 (2016).
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 
Nica, A. C. et al. Cell-type, allelic, and genetic signatures in the human pancreatic beta cell transcriptome. Genome Res. 23, 1554–1562 (2013).
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 
Download references
A.L.G. is a Wellcome Senior Fellow in Basic Biomedical Science. A.K.R and S.K.T. are Radcliffe Department of Medicine Scholars and A.K.R received a travel fellowship from the European Foundation for the Study of Diabetes (EFSD). A.L.G. was funded by the Wellcome (200837), the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) (U01-DK105535, U01-DK085545, UM1DK126185) and the Stanford Diabetes Research Center (NIDDK award P30DK116074). The project was further supported by the National Center for Research Resources (NCRR) (1S10RR026780-01) and National Institutes of Health (NIH) (grants R01 DK108817 and R01 DK107507 to S.K.K.) and a Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation (JDRF fellowship) (to R.J.B.). P.E.M. is supported by the Canada Research Chair in Islet Biology and in part by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (MOP, 148451). We thank past and current members of the Gloyn lab for advice and encouragement, Dylan Jones for library amplification, Ruddy Montandon for FACS sorting, the Oxford Genomics Centre (Wellcome Centre for Human Genetics) for sequencing, Gene Vector and Virus Core (GVVC) for generating the lentivirus with CALCOCO2 vector plasmids, the EM core in Cell Sciences Imaging Facility (CSIF) for the preparation of EM samples and the project described was supported, in part, by ARRA award 1S10RR026780-01 from the National Center for Research Resources (NCRR). We thank Karla Kirkegaard for advice with the LC3 staining. We thank Yan Hang, Mollie Friedlander and the Islet Core of the Stanford Diabetes Research Centre for support with hormone secretion assays. We gratefully acknowledge organ donors and their families, and islet procurement through the Alberta Diabetes Institute Islet Core with the assistance of the Human Organ Procurement and Exchange (HOPE) program, Trillium Gift of Life Network (TGLN) and other Canadian organ procurement organizations, the Integrated Islet Distribution Program (U.S. NIH UC4 DK098085), the National Disease Research Interchange, and the International Institute for the Advancement of Medicine. All donors’ families gave informed consent for the use of pancreatic tissue in research. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript.
These authors contributed equally: Yingying Ye, Elena Navarro-Guerrero.
Oxford Centre for Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
Antje K. Rottner, Soren K. Thomsen, Sameena Nawaz & Anna L. Gloyn
Department of Pediatrics, Division of Endocrinology, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
Yingying Ye, Varsha Rajesh, Alina Pollner, Jing Yang, Han Sun, Daniel Ebner & Anna L. Gloyn
Target Discovery Institute, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
Elena Navarro-Guerrero & Roberta Baronio
Department of Developmental Biology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
Romina J. Bevacqua & Seung K. Kim
Stanford Diabetes Research Centre, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
Romina J. Bevacqua, Seung K. Kim & Anna L. Gloyn
Department of Pharmacology and Alberta Diabetes Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Aliya F. Spigelman, Austin Bautista, James Lyon, Nancy Smith, Jocelyn E. Manning Fox & Patrick E. MacDonald
Oxford NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford University Hospitals Trust, Oxford, UK
Agata Wesolowska-Andersen & Anna L. Gloyn
Wellcome Centre for Human Genetics, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
Anna L. Gloyn
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
A.K.R., Y.Y., S.K.T. and A.L.G. conceived the study. A.K.R., E.N-G. and S.K.T. performed CRISPR screening optimization experiments. A.K.R., E.N-G., R.B. and S.N. performed the CRISPR screen. E.N-G. and R.B performed sequencing library preparation. A.K.R. analyzed the CRISPR screening data. A.W-A. contributed to the CRISPR screening analysis. A.K.R. and A.L.G. performed data integration analysis. A.K.R. performed the validation of CALCOCO2, QSER1 and PLCB3 in beta cells. A.F.S., A.B., J.L., N.S., J.M.F., P.E.M. and A.L.G. assessed CALCOCO2 risk alleles in human islets. Y.Y., V.R., A.P. and J.Y. performed CALCOCO2 follow-up studies in EndoC-βH1. A.K.R. and R.J.B. performed islet immunostainings. R.J.B., A.K.R. and V.R. performed islet shRNA knockdown experiments. H.S. analyzed RNA-seq data. S.K.K., J.M.F., D.E., P.E.M. and A.L.G. supervised the research. A.K.R. and A.L.G. wrote the manuscript. All authors approved the final draft of the manuscript.
Correspondence to Anna L. Gloyn.
The authors declare the following competing interests: A.K.R. is now an employee of AstraZeneca, S.K.T. is now an employee of Vertex Pharmaceuticals and A.W-A. is now an employee of Genomics plc. D.E. and E.N-G are now also affiliated with XCellomics. All experimental work by A.K.R., S.K.T. and A.W-A. was carried out under employment at the University of Oxford. A.K.R. holds stocks in Astra Zeneca. A.L.G.’s spouse holds stock options in Roche. The other authors declare no competing interests.
Nature Genetics thanks Bridget Wagner and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Histograms showing different FACS staining strategies in EndoC-βH1 comparing intracellular insulin (blue graph) and respective isotype controls (pink graph) using (a) different monoclonal primary antibodies as indicated (purple, blue, pink antibody) in combination with a secondary Ab (gray) conjugated to AF488 (green) or direct conjugation to FITC (green) and (b) using different staining protocols with various fixation (top row) or permeabilization buffers (bottom row) as indicated. Three independent experiments were performed and representative histograms are shown. The genome-wide CRISPR screen was performed using the anti-INS antibody from Cell Signaling and the commercial fixation and permeabilisation Cytofix/Cytoperm reagents and protocol from BD Sciences.
Representative FACS images and sorting gates for stained EndoC-βH1 in the genome-wide CRISPR screens. (a) Sorting gates assessing cell size, granularity and viability to exclude debris, define singlets and live cells. (b) Resorting of low insulin cell population to assess the sample purity. SSC-A, side scatter area; FSC-A, forward scatter area; FSC-W, forward scatter width.
(a) CRISPR screen outline from initial FACS sorting of transduced EndoC-βH1 to final sequencing analysis. (b, c, e) Read count and mapped sgRNA quality control for low insulin (LOW1, LOW2), high insulin (HIGH1, HIGH2) and reference samples (REF1, REF2) from both replicates including: (b) total read counts and the proportion of mapped reads and (c) the number of zero-count sgRNAs as proportion of total sgRNAs and (e) normalized read count distributions. Boxes show IQR between first and third quartiles, the horizontal line shows the median and whiskers show Q3 + 1.5 × IQR and Q1 − 1.5 × IQR. (d) Principal Component Analysis on normalized sgRNA read counts for the first two components of low (gray) and high (blue) insulin content and reference samples (purple) from both replicates. (f–i) Pairwise Pearson correlation analysis of fold changes between low and high insulin content for each replicate (f), reference replicates (g), low insulin content replicates (h) and high insulin content replicates (i). The purple line indicates the linear regression line. Log2FC, log2 (fold change); r, Pearson correlation coefficient. All data are sgRNA reads from two independent genome-wide CRISPR screen replicates.
STRING pathway analysis showing protein-protein associations including physical and functional interactions for CRISPR screening hits. Clusters were manually identified, annotated, and individually plotted and selected clusters are shown. Confidence level to determine interactions was set to highest confidence (0.9).
(a) CALCOCO2 locus with credible set GWAS association signals (top) and neighboring genes (bottom). (b–g) sgRNA count distribution for all 8 sgRNAs per gene (4 sgRNAs per replicate) in the genome-wide CRISPR screen for genes at the CALCOCO2 locus. Changes in sgRNA count from low to high insulin content sample with each color representing the same sgRNA across the two screen replicates. The black dashed line represents the median sgRNA count for this gene. (h) EndoC-βH1 were stably transduced with either control virus and siRNA (siNT), control virus and siCALCOCO2 or lentivirus to express CALCOCO2 harboring silent mutations (mutCALCOCO2) making it resistant to siCALCOCO2 (P = 0.0352). Data were normalized to their respective control (siNT) and analyzed using a one-sample t-test. All data are mean ± SEM from six independent experiments or two independent genome-wide CRISPR screen replicates. P-value * < 0.05. No graphical depiction of significance indicates non-significant results. NT, non-targeting.
(a) Gene prioritization approach combining genes with causal evidence as T2D effector transcripts (as outlined in the integration approach) while also not being a screening hit, highlighted QSER1 and PLCB3. PLCB3 plays a role in the amplification pathway in the beta cell but has also been associated with insulin action in a multitrait physiological clustering approach. QSER1 has recently been identified as a DNA methylation regulator associated with pancreatic differentiation defects. (b) Changes in sgRNA count from low to high insulin content sample with each color representing the same sgRNA across the two screen replicates. The black dashed line represents the median sgRNA count for this gene. (d–n) All data are from siQSER1 or siPLCB3 treated EndoC-βH1 compared to non-targeting control cells. (d) mRNA expression of QSER1 and PLCB3 in their respective silenced cells (blue) compared to siNT control cells (gray) (P = 0.0010, 0.0005). (e) Insulin content in pg per 20 000 cells. (f) mRNA expression of INS. (g, k) Insulin secretion normalized to siNT or (i,m) to insulin content and siNT in 1 mM, 20 mM, 1 mM + 100 μM tolbutamide or 20 mM glucose+100 μM diazoxide. (h, j, l, n) Insulin secretion fold change from 1 to 20 mM glucose. All data are mean ± SEM from three (d, f–n) or 12 (e) independent experiments or two independent genome-wide CRISPR screens (b, c). Data were analyzed using two-sample t-test (d, h, j, l, n) and one-way ANOVA with Sidak’s multiple comparison test (e, f, g, i, k, m). No graphical depiction of significance indicates non-significant results. P-values *** < 0.001. FC, fold change; LFC, log2 (fold change); NT, non-targeting.
Immunofluorescence staining of EndoC-βH1 treated with siCALCOCO2 or siNT (a) and exocrine tissue in pancreas sections (b). Sections were double immunostained for INS and CALCOCO2 (red or green as indicated). Cell nuclei were counterstained with DAPI (blue). Scale bar is 6 μm (a) or 10 μm (b). d: ductal cells; a: acinar cells; i: islet. NT, non-targeting. All images are representative from three independent immunofluorescence staining.
All data are from siCALCOCO2 treated EndoC-βH1 compared to non-targeting control cells. (a–d, g, h, k–m) mRNA expression of indicated target genes measured in RNA-Seq (a–d, k–m) or qPCR (g, h) with their respective silenced cells (blue) compared to siNT control cells (gray) (P = 1.87 × 10⁻⁶). (e, f) Quantification of altered mitochondria in EM images based on abnormal shape or cristae, normalized to total number of mitochondria by blinded assessor two and three (P < 0.0001, 0.0032). (i, j) Quantification of mature insulin granules normalized to total number of granules per cell in EM images by blinded assessor two and three (P = 0.0002, 0.0002). (n, o) Protein level of PCSK1 (n), PCSK2 (o) and its loading control GAPDH. (p, q) Quantification of PCSK1 (p) and PCSK2 (q) western blot protein level normalized to GAPDH and siNT control cells. r,s) Insulin (r) or proinsulin content (s) after treatment with MG132 at 1 μM (+), 10 μM (++) or DMSO compared to siNT control cells (dotted line). All data are mean ± SEM from three independent experiments or at least sixteen cells measured by three independent assessors (e, f, i, j). The protein level is displayed as percentage of siNT which is highlighted as dotted line at 100%. Data were analyzed using two-sample t-test (e–j), Wald test in DESeq2 adjusted using the Benjamini and Hochberg method (a–d, k–m), one-sample t-test (p, q) and one-way ANOVA with Sidak’s multiple comparison test (r, s). No graphical depiction of significance indicates non-significant results. P-values ** < 0.01, *** < 0.001, **** < 0.0001. NT, non-targeting.
Source data
Supplementary Tables 2 and 3, Methods and Discussion.
Supplementary Table 1—Screen hits. Supplementary Table 2—Prioritized causal genes for T2D based on integration with T2D effector gene predictions. Supplementary Table 3—Human tissue donor details. Supplementary Table 4—Resources. Supplementary Table 5—RNA-seq. Supplementary Table 6—Islet donor. Supplementary Table 7—sgRNA hits. Supplementary Table 8—Screen_all sgRNA.
Unprocessed western blots.
Unprocessed western blots.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Reprints and Permissions
Rottner, A.K., Ye, Y., Navarro-Guerrero, E. et al. A genome-wide CRISPR screen identifies CALCOCO2 as a regulator of beta cell function influencing type 2 diabetes risk. Nat Genet (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-022-01261-2
Download citation
Received: 21 May 2021
Accepted: 26 October 2022
Published: 21 December 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-022-01261-2
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
Advertisement
Nature Genetics (Nat Genet) ISSN 1546-1718 (online) ISSN 1061-4036 (print)
© 2022 Springer Nature Limited
Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

source